Austin v. Crosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Austin v. Crosby

921 So. 2d 737, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 2006 WL 354306

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-5868

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 921 So. 2d 737 (Austin v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. Crosby, 921 So. 2d 737, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 2006 WL 354306 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 6, 2006, the Court has determined that the lower tribunal’s October 27, 2005, order is not an appealable order. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the dismissal, the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, and the appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time, are hereby denied as moot.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 6, 2006, the Court has determined that the lower tribunal’s October 27, 2005, order is not an appealable order. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the dismissal, the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, and the appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time, are hereby denied as moot.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 So. 2d 737, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 2006 WL 354306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack