Austin v. Crosby
921 So. 2d 737, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 2006 WL 354306
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 2006·No. No. 1D05-5868·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 6, 2006, the Court has determined that the lower tribunal’s October 27, 2005, order is not an appealable order. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the dismissal, the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, and the appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time, are hereby denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Crosby, 921 So. 2d 737, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 2006 WL 354306 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
921 So. 2d 737 (Austin v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DM v. Department of Children and Families
921 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)