Austin v. County of Madison

169 A.D.2d 1015
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 A.D.2d 1015 (Austin v. County of Madison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin v. County of Madison, 169 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Mercure, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Tait, Jr., J.), entered December 13, 1989 in Madison County, which conditionally denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute.

This action was commenced on January 14, 1985 and issue was joined on February 28, 1985. On April 15, 1988, defendant served a 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3). During the remaining portion of 1988, examinations before trial were conducted, updated medical reports were exchanged and defendant served first and second amended answers. On May 5, 1989, defendant served a further 90-day demand, conforming to the requirements of CPLR 3216 (b) (3), received by plain[1016]*1016tiffs’ attorney on May 6, 1989. On October 20, 1989, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 (a), alleging that no note of issue had been filed and that the action was not on the calendar. Plaintiffs did not oppose the motion. Supreme Court conditionally denied the motion, granting plaintiffs until November 27, 1989 to file a note of issue. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiffs’ failure to oppose the motion with a showing of (1) justifiable excuse for the failure to file a note of issue within 90 days of defendant’s demand and (2) a meritorious cause of action (see, CPLR 3216 [e]) required Supreme Court to dismiss the complaint without conditions (see, Danskin v Gunther, 155 AD2d 859; Juracka v Ferrara, 137 AD2d 921, 923, lv dismissed 72 NY2d 840, lv denied 74 NY2d 642).

Order modified, on the law, without costs, by striking the conditions attached to the granting of the motion; complaint dismissed, with prejudice; and, as so modified, affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sunshine v. Danbury
181 A.D.2d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A.D.2d 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-county-of-madison-nyappdiv-1991.