Austin v. Costantino
2004 ME 92, 854 A.2d 216, 2004 Me. LEXIS 106
Opinion
[¶ 1] Barbara and Donald Costantino appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) granting Sandra Austin an enlargement of time to complete a settlement agreement. Because a final judgment must “adjudicate the respective rights, duties, and liabilities of the various parties,” Murphy v. Maddaus, 2002 ME 24, ¶ 12, 789 A.2d 1281, 1284 (internal quotations omitted), there has been no final judgment, and we dismiss the Costantinos’ appeal as interlocutory.
The entry is:
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Costantino, 2004 ME 92, 854 A.2d 216, 2004 Me. LEXIS 106 (Me. 2004).
2004 ME 92 (Austin v. Costantino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. Maddaus
2002 ME 24 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2002)