Austin v. Corbin
711 N.W.2d 35, 474 Mich. 1075
Opinion
Ryan AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joshua CORBIN and James Corbin, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we *36 are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Corbin, 711 N.W.2d 35, 474 Mich. 1075 (Mich. 2006).
711 N.W.2d 35 (Austin v. Corbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MacArthur v. RAMSEY HAVENWYCK, INC.
711 N.W.2d 35 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)