Austin v. Corbin
711 N.W.2d 35, 474 Mich. 1075
This text of 711 N.W.2d 35 (Austin v. Corbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Austin v. Corbin, 711 N.W.2d 35, 474 Mich. 1075 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Ryan AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joshua CORBIN and James Corbin, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we *36 are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MacArthur v. RAMSEY HAVENWYCK, INC.
711 N.W.2d 35 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 35, 474 Mich. 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-corbin-mich-2006.