Austin v. Commonwealth
This text of Austin v. Commonwealth (Austin v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Lemons and Agee, JJ., and Russell, S.J.
DIANA MARIE AUSTIN PER CURIAM v. Record No. 040470 November 5, 2004 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
In this case, we granted the petition for appeal of Diana
Marie Austin, a juvenile, to consider whether the Court of
Appeals erred in holding that the Circuit Court of Franklin
County, the trial court, had original jurisdiction over Austin’s
juvenile parole revocation proceeding.
The procedural history and pertinent facts regarding the
revocation of Austin’s parole are not disputed and are recounted
in detail in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Austin v.
Commonwealth, 42 Va. App. 33, 35-37, 590 S.E.2d 68, 69-70
(2003). Upon consideration of the issue and for the reasons
stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, see id. at 37-41,
590 S.E.2d at 70-72, we will affirm its judgment that the trial
court had jurisdiction over Austin’s juvenile parole revocation
proceeding.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Austin v. Commonwealth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-commonwealth-va-2004.