Austin v. Commonwealth
Opinion
v. Record No. 040470 November 5, 2004
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
In this case, we granted the petition for appeal of Diana
Marie Austin, a juvenile, to consider whether the Court of
Appeals erred in holding that the Circuit Court of Franklin
County, the trial court, had original jurisdiction over Austin’s
juvenile parole revocation proceeding.
The procedural history and pertinent facts regarding the
revocation of Austin’s parole are not disputed and are recounted
in detail in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Austin v.
Commonwealth, 42 Va. App. 33, 35-37, 590 S.E.2d 68, 69-70
(2003). Upon consideration of the issue and for the reasons
stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, see id. at 37-41,
590 S.E.2d at 70-72, we will affirm its judgment that the trial
court had jurisdiction over Austin’s juvenile parole revocation
proceeding.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Commonwealth (Austin v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.