Austin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 628 F. App'x 194 (Austin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Larry J. Austin appeals from the tax court’s orders: (1) denying his motion for litigation and administrative costs pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7430 (2012), and (2) denying his motion to reopen discovery. Wé have reviewed the materials before the court, including the parties’ briefs and the tax court’s opinions, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Austin v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 28393-09 (U.S. Tax Ct. Dec. 14, 2014; Dec. [195]*19517, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
628 F. App'x 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-2016.