Austin v. City of Glenn Height
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-10136 Summary Calendar
RICK AUSTIN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF GLENN HEIGHTS, ET AL,
Defendants,
CITY OF GLENN HEIGHTS,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-1720-G - - - - - - - - - - February 12, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rick Austin appeals the district court’s dismissal of his
civil rights complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f). for
failing to file timely a joint status report. The district
court’s order does not indicate whether the judgment was with or
without prejudice; nevertheless, since the order does not
indicate that the dismissal is without prejudice, it is deemed an
adjudication on the merits. See Callip v. Harris County Child
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-10136 -2-
Welfare Dept., 757 F.2d 1513, 1519 (5th Cir. 1985)(Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(b) case). The district court did not consider alternatives
to dismissing Austin’s claim; therefore, the district court’s
order is VACATED, and Austin’s case is REMANDED to determine
whether a lesser sanction would serve the interests of justice.
See SEC v. First Houston Capital Resources Fund, 979 F.2d 380,
381-82 (5th Cir. 1992).
VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. City of Glenn Height (Austin v. City of Glenn Height) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.