Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Austin v. City of Dunkirk

Austin v. City of Dunkirk

147 A.D. 919
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 147 A.D. 919 (Austin v. City of Dunkirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin v. City of Dunkirk, 147 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the grounds stated in his opinion upon the former appeal (reported at 140 App. Div. 44), and Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground that the city cannot be held liable for negligence in building a sidewalk in the manner shown by the evidence of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin v. City of Dunkirk
140 A.D. 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 A.D. 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-city-of-dunkirk-nyappdiv-1911.