Austin v. City of Dunkirk
147 A.D. 919
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1911·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the grounds stated in his opinion upon the former appeal (reported at 140 App. Div. 44), and Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground that the city cannot be held liable for negligence in building a sidewalk in the manner shown by the evidence of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. City of Dunkirk, 147 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
147 A.D. 919 (Austin v. City of Dunkirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin v. City of Dunkirk
140 A.D. 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)