Austin v. City of Buffalo
This text of 79 N.Y.2d 1033 (Austin v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from those portions of the Appellate Division orders that dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Burnwell Gas of Alden, Inc., Chemi-Trol Chemical Co., RegO Company, and Seimax Wholesale Supply Corp., and from those portions of the Appellate Division orders that dismissed certain portions of plaintiffs’ claims against George D. Wilson, Sr., Chimera Radiator Company, Chimera Radiator Manufacturing Co., Inc., L.B.G. Radiator Company, Inc., and Amherst Radiator Co., dismissed upon the ground that those portions of the orders do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Judge Hancock, Jr., taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 N.Y.2d 1033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-city-of-buffalo-ny-1992.