Austin v. Cary

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Austin v. Cary

11 S.E.2d 102, 63 Ga. App. 383, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 103

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1940·No. 28552.·Published

Opinion

Belton, J.

A petition at common law, filed by an employee against a contractor and a subcontractor, seeking to recover “compensation” for an injury to the employee, not alleged to have been due to the negligence of either or both of the defendants, set forth no cause of action, and was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belton, J.

A petition at common law, filed by an employee against a contractor and a subcontractor, seeking to recover “compensation” for an injury to the employee, not alleged to have been due to the negligence of either or both of the defendants, set forth no cause of action, and was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Austin v. Cary, 11 S.E.2d 102, 63 Ga. App. 383, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

11 S.E.2d 102 (Austin v. Cary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.