Austin v. Cary

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Austin v. Cary

11 S.E.2d 102, 63 Ga. App. 383, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 103

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 16, 1940

Docket28552.

StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.E.2d 102 (Austin v. Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. Cary, 11 S.E.2d 102, 63 Ga. App. 383, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Belton, J.

A petition at common law, filed by an employee against a contractor and a subcontractor, seeking to recover “compensation” for an injury to the employee, not alleged to have been due to the negligence of either or both of the defendants, set forth no cause of action, and was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belton, J.

A petition at common law, filed by an employee against a contractor and a subcontractor, seeking to recover “compensation” for an injury to the employee, not alleged to have been due to the negligence of either or both of the defendants, set forth no cause of action, and was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 S.E.2d 102, 63 Ga. App. 383, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-cary-gactapp-1940.