Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Austin v. Buffalo Electric Vehicle Co.

Austin v. Buffalo Electric Vehicle Co.

173 A.D. 925, 158 N.Y.S. 148
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D. 925 (Austin v. Buffalo Electric Vehicle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin v. Buffalo Electric Vehicle Co., 173 A.D. 925, 158 N.Y.S. 148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinions

Per Curiam:

It does not appear from the evidence that the'automobile which caused the injury was in the possession or under the control of the defendant. It also would appear from the evidence on this trial that the proximate cause of the injury was the negligent act of a third person for whose act the defendant was not responsible. The j udgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Page and Davis, JJ.; Scott, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaman v. . Koehler
25 N.E. 957 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Wylde v. Northern Railroad Co. of New Jersey
53 N.Y. 156 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
Sheridan v. Brooklyn City & Newtown Railroad
36 N.Y. 39 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Curley v. Electric Vehicle Co.
68 A.D. 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 925, 158 N.Y.S. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-buffalo-electric-vehicle-co-nyappdiv-1916.