Austin v. Boston & Maine Railroad

41 N.E. 288, 164 Mass. 282, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 227
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 9, 1895·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Morton, J.

We do not see how this case can be distinguished from Lovejoy v. Boston & Lowell Railroad, 125 Mass. 79, Thain v. Old Colony Railroad, 161 Mass. 353, and Goodes v. Boston & Albany Railroad, 162 Mass. 287. The plaintiff had been employed as a freight brakeman on the Rockport freight for two years or more, and had had occasion to go by this post nearly or quite every day. The post was only one of many structures as near to the track as it was, and the plaintiff must be held to have taken the risk of injury from its proximity, whether he actually knew of the danger or not. The slight sagging of the post towards the track, of which there was evidence, is not shown to have had anything to do with the injury to the plaintiff.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Austin v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 41 N.E. 288, 164 Mass. 282, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 227 (Mass. 1895).

41 N.E. 288 (Austin v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kempton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
104 N.E. 358 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Bence v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
63 N.E. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Potter v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
122 Mich. 179 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Phelps v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.
122 Mich. 171 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Leazotte v. Boston & Maine Railroad
45 A. 1084 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1899)
Quinn v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
77 N.W. 464 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Davis v. Forbes
47 L.R.A. 170 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Murch v. Thomas Wilson's Sons & Co.
47 N.E. 111 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Bell v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
47 N.E. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Kenney v. Hingham Cordage Co.
47 N.E. 117 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Pennsylvania Co. v. Finney
42 N.E. 816 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)