Austin v. BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION

Michigan Supreme Court

Austin v. BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION

772 N.W.2d 391

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 2009·No. 139292·Published

Opinion

772 N.W.2d 391 (2009)

Richard AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION, Steven D. London and Owen Johnston, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket Nos. 139292, 139293. COA Nos. 287801, 288675.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 28, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

772 N.W.2d 391 (2009)

Richard AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION, Steven D. London and Owen Johnston, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket Nos. 139292, 139293. COA Nos. 287801, 288675.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 28, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Austin v. BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION, 772 N.W.2d 391 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

772 N.W.2d 391 (Austin v. BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Richard AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION, Steven D. London and Owen Johnston, Defendants-Appellants.

Order

Richard AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BEKUM AMERICA CORPORATION, Steven D. London and Owen Johnston, Defendants-Appellants.