Austin v. Austin's Rack, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Austin v. Austin's Rack, Inc.

413 So. 2d 844, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20068

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 11, 1982

DocketNo. 81-1523

StatusPublished

This text of 413 So. 2d 844 (Austin v. Austin's Rack, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. Austin's Rack, Inc., 413 So. 2d 844, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20068 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Because there is a complete absence of any justiciable issue, we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we grant Austin’s Rack’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and order Jack Austin to pay Austin’s Rack, Inc. an attorney’s fee in the amount of $1,000. T. I. E. Communications v. Toyota Motor Carriers, Inc., 391 So.2d 697 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); §§ 57.105, 59.46, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Because there is a complete absence of any justiciable issue, we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we grant Austin’s Rack’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and order Jack Austin to pay Austin’s Rack, Inc. an attorney’s fee in the amount of $1,000. T. I. E. Communications v. Toyota Motor Carriers, Inc., 391 So.2d 697 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); §§ 57.105, 59.46, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

413 So. 2d 844, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-austins-rack-inc-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack