Austin v. Atlantic Beach Bridge Corp.
This text of 243 A.D. 721 (Austin v. Atlantic Beach Bridge Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a receiver, in an action to foreclose mortgages covering the property and franchises of a bridge corporation, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, there existed at the time of the execution and delivery of the mortgages in question statutory authority enabling the respondent to make the mortgages in question. (General Corp. Law, § 2; Stock Corp. Law, § 16.) In the exercise of a sound discretion the motion should have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 721, 277 N.Y.S. 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-atlantic-beach-bridge-corp-nyappdiv-1935.