Austin v. Atlantic Beach Bridge Corp.

243 A.D. 721, 277 N.Y.S. 1003

Opinion

— Order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a receiver, in an action to foreclose mortgages covering the property and franchises of a bridge corporation, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, there existed at the time of the execution and delivery of the mortgages in question statutory authority enabling the respondent to make the mortgages in question. (General Corp. Law, § 2; Stock Corp. Law, § 16.) In the exercise of a sound discretion the motion should have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Austin v. Atlantic Beach Bridge Corp., 243 A.D. 721, 277 N.Y.S. 1003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 721 (Austin v. Atlantic Beach Bridge Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.