Austin Thomas v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2005·No. 129318·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

129318 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan AUSTIN M. THOMAS, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129318 AGC: 0315/02 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On the order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is treated as a complaint for superintending control under MCR 7.304, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 27, 2005 _________________________________________ p1219 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Austin Thomas v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2005).

Austin Thomas v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Austin Thomas v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.