Austin, Stacey Antonine

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 6, 2016
DocketWR-84,546-02
StatusPublished

This text of Austin, Stacey Antonine (Austin, Stacey Antonine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin, Stacey Antonine, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,546-02

EX PARTE STACEY ANTOINE AUSTIN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W08-57700-M(A) IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant alleges, among other things, that counsel requested and received money from

Applicant’s family for the purpose of “enticing a State’s witness with money to prevent him from

testifying in court,” which created a conflict of interest. Applicant also contends that his plea was

involuntary because counsel failed to inform Applicant of the consequences of his plea and coerced 2

Applicant to plead guilty without investigating Applicant’s alibi or discrepancies in the State’s case.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,

additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order

trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and involuntary

plea. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s

claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 6, 2016

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Austin, Stacey Antonine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-stacey-antonine-texcrimapp-2016.