Austin, S. v. Feder, E.
This text of Austin, S. v. Feder, E. (Austin, S. v. Feder, E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
SEAN AUSTIN, : No. 62 EM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : ERIC FEDER, OFFICER OF JUDICIAL : RECORDS AND LAWRANCE [SIC] S. : KRASNER, PHILA. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the “Civil Action - Mandamus” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Austin, S. v. Feder, E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-s-v-feder-e-pa-2020.