Austin Kan Doo Plumbing, Inc. and Craig Mundt v. AC Plumbing Supply, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Austin Kan Doo Plumbing, Inc. and Craig Mundt v. AC Plumbing Supply, Inc.

DecidedAugust 7, 2008

Docket14-08-00423-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Austin Kan Doo Plumbing, Inc. and Craig Mundt v. AC Plumbing Supply, Inc. (Austin Kan Doo Plumbing, Inc. and Craig Mundt v. AC Plumbing Supply, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin Kan Doo Plumbing, Inc. and Craig Mundt v. AC Plumbing Supply, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 7, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 7, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00423-CV

AUSTIN KAN DOO PLUMBING, INC. AND CRAIG MUNDT, Appellants

V.

AC PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-68990

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 26, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on May 16, 2008. To date, our records show that neither appellant has paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent). Appellant Craig Mundt has not established indigence. Id. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

This Court gave appellants the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, but appellants have not paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of June 26, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 7, 2008.

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 7, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 7, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00423-CV

AUSTIN KAN DOO PLUMBING, INC. AND CRAIG MUNDT, Appellants

V.

AC PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-68990

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 26, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on May 16, 2008. To date, our records show that neither appellant has paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent). Appellant Craig Mundt has not established indigence. Id. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

This Court gave appellants the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, but appellants have not paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of June 26, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 7, 2008.

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Guzman.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Austin Kan Doo Plumbing, Inc. and Craig Mundt v. AC Plumbing Supply, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-kan-doo-plumbing-inc-and-craig-mundt-v-ac-p-texapp-2008.