Austin Ford, Inc. v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Florida

Austin Ford, Inc. v. Cunningham

198 So. 2d 829, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3896

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 1967

DocketNo. 35890

StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 2d 829 (Austin Ford, Inc. v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin Ford, Inc. v. Cunningham, 198 So. 2d 829, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3896 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. However, after hearing argument and considering further the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ heretofore issued is discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. However, after hearing argument and considering further the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ heretofore issued is discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 So. 2d 829, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-ford-inc-v-cunningham-fla-1967.