AUSTIN DENNIS BOOKER v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., AUTUMN BALDWIN

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 24, 2025
DocketA25A0998
StatusPublished

This text of AUSTIN DENNIS BOOKER v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., AUTUMN BALDWIN (AUSTIN DENNIS BOOKER v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., AUTUMN BALDWIN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
AUSTIN DENNIS BOOKER v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., AUTUMN BALDWIN, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 24, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0998. AUSTIN DENNIS BOOKER v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., AUTUMN BALDWIN et al.

Defendant Austin Booker filed this direct appeal from a superior court order

establishing his paternity to two minor children and requiring him to pay child

support. We lack jurisdiction.

“Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic

relations cases” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review.

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Because this case involves paternity and the collection of

child support, it is a domestic relations case within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)

(2). See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731 SE2d 110)

(2012) (an action in which the “underlying subject matter is a father’s obligation to

provide child support” is “a domestic relations case subject to review only by

application”); Brown v. Dept. of Human Resources, 204 Ga. App. 27, 27 (418 SE2d 404)

(1992) (“Appeals arising out of paternity petitions are domestic relations cases which

require compliance with the discretionary appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-35.”).

“Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v.

Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Accordingly, Booker was required to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain

review of the superior court’s order.

His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED. See Booker, 317 Ga. App. at 427; Brown, 204 Ga. App. at 27-28.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/24/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Department of Human Resources
418 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Booker v. Georgia Department of Human Resources
731 S.E.2d 110 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
AUSTIN DENNIS BOOKER v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., AUTUMN BALDWIN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-dennis-booker-v-the-georgia-department-of-human-services-ex-rel-gactapp-2025.