Austin Bridge & Road, LP v. Raquel Suarez, Lucila Suarez, Raquel Suarez, Ruben Dario Suarez, Individually and as Heirs to and Representatives of the Estate of Jose Dario Suarez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2017
Docket01-16-00682-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Austin Bridge & Road, LP v. Raquel Suarez, Lucila Suarez, Raquel Suarez, Ruben Dario Suarez, Individually and as Heirs to and Representatives of the Estate of Jose Dario Suarez (Austin Bridge & Road, LP v. Raquel Suarez, Lucila Suarez, Raquel Suarez, Ruben Dario Suarez, Individually and as Heirs to and Representatives of the Estate of Jose Dario Suarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin Bridge & Road, LP v. Raquel Suarez, Lucila Suarez, Raquel Suarez, Ruben Dario Suarez, Individually and as Heirs to and Representatives of the Estate of Jose Dario Suarez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-16-00682-CV Style: Austin Bridge & Road, LP v. Raquel Suarez, Lucila Suarez, Raquel Suarez, Ruben Dario Suarez, Individually and as heirs to and Representatives of the estate of Jose Dario Suarez, deceased Date motion filed*: February 8, 2017 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record Party filing motion: Court Reporter Carolyn Ruiz Coronado Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: November 29, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: February 8, 2017 Date Requested: March 9, 2017 (100 days from original deadline)

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: March 9, 2017.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ On January 13, 2017, the Clerk of this Court granted the reporter’s second extension request until February 8, 2017, with no further extensions to be granted absent exceptional circumstances, but no show-cause warnings were warranted then. Thus, the reporter’s third extension request is granted, but the reporter is warned that no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 35.3(c). Accordingly, if the reporter’s record is not filed by March 9, 2017, the Court may abate for the trial court to hold a show-cause hearing to determine whether Carolyn Ruiz Coronado should be held in contempt. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn Keyes X Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: February 14, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Austin Bridge & Road, LP v. Raquel Suarez, Lucila Suarez, Raquel Suarez, Ruben Dario Suarez, Individually and as Heirs to and Representatives of the Estate of Jose Dario Suarez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-bridge-road-lp-v-raquel-suarez-lucila-suarez-raquel-suarez-texapp-2017.