Austin Branch Osgood v. Katharyn F. Osgood

220 F.2d 825, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 145, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 1955
Docket12294_1
StatusPublished

This text of 220 F.2d 825 (Austin Branch Osgood v. Katharyn F. Osgood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin Branch Osgood v. Katharyn F. Osgood, 220 F.2d 825, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 145, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant husband appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff wife a divorce a mensa et thoro, permanent alimony and other incidental relief. Having examined the record, we find no ground for reversal or modification of the decree. If circumstances change, of course, our affirmance does not preclude appellant from seeking relief at that time in the District Court with regard to custody and visitation of his child or the amount of alimony. See Bartlett v. Bartlett, 95 U.S.App.D.C. -, 221 F.2d 508, and cases cited at footnote 18.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartlett v. Bartlett
221 F.2d 508 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 F.2d 825, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 145, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-branch-osgood-v-katharyn-f-osgood-cadc-1955.