Austin Branch Osgood v. Katharyn F. Osgood
This text of 220 F.2d 825 (Austin Branch Osgood v. Katharyn F. Osgood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant husband appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff wife a divorce a mensa et thoro, permanent alimony and other incidental relief. Having examined the record, we find no ground for reversal or modification of the decree. If circumstances change, of course, our affirmance does not preclude appellant from seeking relief at that time in the District Court with regard to custody and visitation of his child or the amount of alimony. See Bartlett v. Bartlett, 95 U.S.App.D.C. -, 221 F.2d 508, and cases cited at footnote 18.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 F.2d 825, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 145, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-branch-osgood-v-katharyn-f-osgood-cadc-1955.