Austin Branch Osgood v. Katharyn F. Osgood

220 F.2d 825, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 145, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant husband appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff wife a divorce a mensa et thoro, permanent alimony and other incidental relief. Having examined the record, we find no ground for reversal or modification of the decree. If circumstances change, of course, our affirmance does not preclude appellant from seeking relief at that time in the District Court with regard to custody and visitation of his child or the amount of alimony. See Bartlett v. Bartlett, 95 U.S.App.D.C. -, 221 F.2d 508, and cases cited at footnote 18.

Affirmed.