Auslander v. Chernick
This text of 739 N.W.2d 620 (Auslander v. Chernick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert AUSLANDER and Carol Auslander, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Allan W. CHERNICK, M.D., Cardiovascular Specialists, P.C., Howard S. Goldberg, M.D., and Howard S. Goldberg, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for entry of a judgment granting the defendants' motion for summary disposition.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 N.W.2d 620, 480 Mich. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auslander-v-chernick-mich-2007.