Ausbrooks v. State

94 S.E. 304, 147 Ga. 407, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 219
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 17, 1917
DocketNo. 326
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 304 (Ausbrooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ausbrooks v. State, 94 S.E. 304, 147 Ga. 407, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 219 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

1. The act of 1916 (Acts 1916, p. 88), amending the act of 1909 (Acts 1909, p. 123), establishing a board of osteopathic examiners, by extending the provisions of the original act to all other non-drug-giving practitioners except Christian Scientists and masseurs, is unconstitutional, because it seeks to import into the act to be amended matter not germane to it and not indicated by its caption, and therefore offends against the constitutional provision that “No law or ordinance shall pass which refers to more than one subject-matter, or contains matter different from what is expressed in the title thereof.” Civil Code, § 6437.

2. The court erred in overruling the demurrer based upon the ground indicated in the preceding note, and in refusing a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent, and Gilbert, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Bell
198 S.E. 711 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 304, 147 Ga. 407, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ausbrooks-v-state-ga-1917.