Ausbie v. California

375 U.S. 24, 84 S. Ct. 87, 11 L. Ed. 2d 43, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 533
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1963·No. 52 M·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ausbie v. California, 375 U.S. 24, 84 S. Ct. 87, 11 L. Ed. 2d 43, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 533 (1963).

375 U.S. 24 (Ausbie v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donnell v. Swenson
258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Missouri, 1966)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers
213 A.2d 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Henry v. City of Rock Hill
376 U.S. 776 (Supreme Court, 1964)