Aurrecochea v. Hinckley

1 Cal. Unrep. 864
California Supreme Court·Decided November 12, 1874·No. No. 3981·Published

Opinions

McKINSTRY, J.

— The Mexican claim under which plaintiffs deraign title was not finally confirmed when the act of [865]*865April 18, 1863, took effect (Stats. 1863, p. 325), nor had a patent for the land been issued when this action was. brought. The defendant was in the adverse possession more than five years before the commencement of the action. If the statute of 1863 is not in conflict with the constitution of the United States, or with a treaty, the defendant was entitled to judgment. No argument is made in the briefs upon the subject of such conflict.

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.

We concur: Crockett, J.; Niles, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aurrecochea v. Hinckley, 1 Cal. Unrep. 864 (Cal. 1874).

1 Cal. Unrep. 864 (Aurrecochea v. Hinckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Dyke
20 Cal. 225 (California Supreme Court, 1862)
Galland v. Lewis
26 Cal. 46 (California Supreme Court, 1864)
Beach v. Gabriel
29 Cal. 580 (California Supreme Court, 1866)
Mahoney v. Van Winkle
33 Cal. 448 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Gardiner v. Miller
47 Cal. 570 (California Supreme Court, 1874)
McManus v. O'Sullivan
48 Cal. 7 (California Supreme Court, 1874)