Auriemme v. State

648 So. 2d 1254, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 485, 1995 WL 28996
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1995
DocketNo. 94-60
StatusPublished

This text of 648 So. 2d 1254 (Auriemme v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Auriemme v. State, 648 So. 2d 1254, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 485, 1995 WL 28996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(1)(E) (defendant can’t appeal from judgment entered on plea of guilty or plea of nolo contendere); Reynolds v. State, 598 So.2d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (a negotiated plea which encompasses a specific sentence for violation of probation is a valid sentence).

COBB, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reynolds v. State
598 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 So. 2d 1254, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 485, 1995 WL 28996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auriemme-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.