Aurianne v. Eschbacher
This text of 28 La. Ann. 48 (Aurianne v. Eschbacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit on a promissory note against the maker and two indorsers, and from a judgment against them the indorsers, George [49]*49Mertz and Ed. Erliard, haye appealed. -The objection is that notice of dishonor was not properly served. Notice was served, as appears by the certificate of the notary attached to the protest, on Mertz, by delivering it “ to his book-keeper in his office,” and on Erhar.d by delivering it “ to his wife in his store, he not being in.” We think the service of notice of dishonor was sufficient. 2 R. 119; 14 L. 494; 15 L. 113; 4 An. 483; 8 An. 136.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 La. Ann. 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aurianne-v-eschbacher-la-1876.