Aurelio O. Gonzalez v. Secretary For the Dept. of Corrections, Emil Lazo v. United States of America, Stephen A. Mobley v. Frederick Head
This text of Aurelio O. Gonzalez v. Secretary For the Dept. of Corrections, Emil Lazo v. United States of America, Stephen A. Mobley v. Frederick Head (Aurelio O. Gonzalez v. Secretary For the Dept. of Corrections, Emil Lazo v. United States of America, Stephen A. Mobley v. Frederick Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ____________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APRIL 1, 2003 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 02-12054 CLERK ____________________________ D. C. Docket No. 97-01935-CV-UUB
AURELIO O. GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, versus
SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, James Crosby, Secretary, Respondent-Appellee.
______________________________
No. 02-12483 ______________________________ D. C. Docket Nos. 96-08752-CV-WJZ and 90-08108 CR-WJZ
EMIL LAZO,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent-Appellee. ---------------------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ---------------------------------
_____________________________
No. 02-14224 _____________________________ D. C. Docket No. 99-00023-CV
STEPHEN A. MOBLEY,
FREDERICK HEAD, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center,
Respondent-Appellee.
---------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ---------------------------------- (April 1, 2003)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
B Y T H E C O U R T:
The Court has determined to hear the following cases en banc: Mobley v.
2 Head, No. 02-14224, Lazo v. U.S., No. 02-12483, and Gonzalez v. Sec’y for the
Dept. of Corrections, No. 02-12054.
The cases will be orally argued before the Court sitting en banc on June 17,
2003, in Atlanta, Georgia.
The Court sua sponte VACATES the following orders: the December 16,
2002, Order issued in Lazo v. U.S., No. 02-12483, as well as the January 10, 2003
and the August 15, 2002, Orders issued in Gonzalez v. Sec’y for the Dept. of
Corrections, No. 02-12054.
Nos. 02-12483 and 02-12054 are hereby REINSTATED.
Counsel for Appellants Lazo and Gonzalez will be appointed by separate
Order.
In light of the above, Appellant Gonzalez’ “Motion to Reconsider, Vacate
or Modify” is DENIED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aurelio O. Gonzalez v. Secretary For the Dept. of Corrections, Emil Lazo v. United States of America, Stephen A. Mobley v. Frederick Head, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aurelio-o-gonzalez-v-secretary-for-the-dept-of-cor-ca11-2003.