Aure v. Board of County Commissioners

70 N.W. 791, 68 Minn. 85, 1897 Minn. LEXIS 346
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 26, 1897
DocketNos. 10,547—(200)
StatusPublished

This text of 70 N.W. 791 (Aure v. Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aure v. Board of County Commissioners, 70 N.W. 791, 68 Minn. 85, 1897 Minn. LEXIS 346 (Mich. 1897).

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Appeal by defendant Hamilton from an order granting an injunction pendente lite. The return consists solely of copies of the complaint in the action, of an answer made by defendants board of county commissioners and county auditor, of the order to show cause why a temporary writ of injunction should not issue, of the order granting the writ, and of the notice of appeal, duly certified by the clerk of the court below as transcripts of the originals in his office. The return is noticeably defective. See Du Toit v. Fergestad, 55 Minn. 462, 57 N. W. 204, and cases cited.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Du Toit v. Fergestad
57 N.W. 204 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 N.W. 791, 68 Minn. 85, 1897 Minn. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aure-v-board-of-county-commissioners-minn-1897.