Aung Aung v. State
This text of Aung Aung v. State (Aung Aung v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-10-0513-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JANUARY 28, 2011 ______________________________
AUNG AUNG,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 122,374; HON. W.F. "CORKY" ROBERTS, PRESIDING _______________________________
Order of Dismissal _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Aung Aung, appellant, attempts to appeal his conviction for two counts of evading arrest and making a terroristic threat. The court imposed sentence on July 29, 2010, and a motion for new trial was timely filed. His notice of appeal was filed on December 17, 2010. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). Therefore, the notice of appeal was due on October 27, 2010. A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, appellants appeal is dismissed.
Brian Quinn Chief Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aung Aung v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aung-aung-v-state-texapp-2011.