Aundra B. Jackson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 15, 2016
Docket14-16-00616-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Aundra B. Jackson v. State (Aundra B. Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aundra B. Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 15, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00616-CR

AUNDRA B. JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1352009

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to murder. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 20 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The sentence was entered on April 6, 2015. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until July 15, 2016. We dismiss the appeal. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Moreover, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aundra B. Jackson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aundra-b-jackson-v-state-texapp-2016.