Aumack v. Dorrance

98 A. 1084, 85 N.J. Eq. 604, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 422
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 98 A. 1084 (Aumack v. Dorrance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aumack v. Dorrance, 98 A. 1084, 85 N.J. Eq. 604, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 422 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance—This Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, ' White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor—IS. For reversal—Minturn—1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A. 1084, 85 N.J. Eq. 604, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aumack-v-dorrance-nj-1916.