Aultman-Taylor Machinery Co. v. Sheets

Appellate Court of Illinois

Aultman-Taylor Machinery Co. v. Sheets

123 Ill. App. 466, 1905 Ill. App. LEXIS 785

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 28, 1905·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It does not appear from the abstract of the bill of exceptions that has been furnished tons that any motion for a new trial was made or that any ruling was made upon any such motion. Ho question therefore arises in this court as to the propriety of the rulings of the Circuit Court upon the admission or rejection of evidence, the giving or refusal of instructions, or as to the weight of the evidetice, or the amount of the verdict and judgment, or any other matter pertaining to the question whether a new trial should be granted. Odin Coal Co. v. Fadlock, 216 Ill. 624.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It does not appear from the abstract of the bill of exceptions that has been furnished tons that any motion for a new trial was made or that any ruling was made upon any such motion. Ho question therefore arises in this court as to the propriety of the rulings of the Circuit Court upon the admission or rejection of evidence, the giving or refusal of instructions, or as to the weight of the evidetice, or the amount of the verdict and judgment, or any other matter pertaining to the question whether a new trial should be granted. Odin Coal Co. v. Fadlock, 216 Ill. 624.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Aultman-Taylor Machinery Co. v. Sheets, 123 Ill. App. 466, 1905 Ill. App. LEXIS 785 (Ill. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

123 Ill. App. 466 (Aultman-Taylor Machinery Co. v. Sheets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related