Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Syme

34 N.Y.S. 379, 87 Hun 295, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 295, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 311
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 14, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 N.Y.S. 379 (Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Syme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Syme, 34 N.Y.S. 379, 87 Hun 295, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 295, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 311 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

PER CURTA M.

The judgment in this action was entered on the 14th of November, 1889. The execution which formed the foundation of this order was issued on the 14th day of November, 1894, and was therefore not issued within five years after the entry of the judgment, the five years having expired upon the 13th of November, 1894. The court, in considering the question of time, takes no ■notice of the fractions of a day. The time commenced to run on the day upon which the judgment was entered, and expired upon the termination of five years thereafter, which was the 13th of November, 1894. The authority to issue an execution only existed during those five years. After the expiration of that time, execution can only be issued upon application to the court The execution not having been issued until after the expiration of that period, and no application to the court having been made, no jurisdiction was conferred.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Syme
23 A.D. 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Connecticut National Bank v. Bayles
17 A.D. 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 N.Y.S. 379, 87 Hun 295, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 295, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aultman-taylor-co-v-syme-nysupct-1895.