Ault v. Cowan
20 Pa. Super. 628, 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 291
This text of 20 Pa. Super. 628 (Ault v. Cowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ault v. Cowan, 20 Pa. Super. 628, 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 291 (Pa. Ct. App. 1902).
Opinion
Opinion by
This judgment must be reversed for the reason that the defendant was never served, and did not appear, nor was it intended by the plaintiffs that the judgment should be entered against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. It was not in court, and the claim of the plaintiffs was against the receivers only.
Judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 Pa. Super. 628, 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ault-v-cowan-pasuperct-1902.