Aulsbrook v. Burke
This text of 199 So. 2d 310 (Aulsbrook v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is substantial competent evidence to support the Court’s finding that there was no equitable assignment to appellee, Har-riette C. Spence Smith, as an individual, of the proceeds of the sale of decedent’s real estate and to support the Chancellor’s Order that Knight G. Aulsbrook and Dolores L. Bigelow render an accounting to appellee Burke.
The so called cross claim bore no relationship to the main suit or the subject matter thereof and the Chancellor properly refused to entertain it or transfer it to the law side of the Court.
The Orders appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 So. 2d 310, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aulsbrook-v-burke-fladistctapp-1967.