Auld v. Estridge
This text of 58 A.D.2d 635 (Auld v. Estridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to recover damages for fraud and to rescind a certain release, in which action defendant counterclaimed, inter alia, to recover moneys paid as guarantor on behalf of plaintiff, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 21, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, adjudged that the release signed by plaintiff was null and void. Judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. The facts of the case are adequately set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice Harnett. We hold that the determination of the trial court was properly made. Hopkins, J. P., Shapiro, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur. [86 Misec2d 895.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A.D.2d 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auld-v-estridge-nyappdiv-1977.