Auld v. City of Elberton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Auld v. City of Elberton

110 S.E. 243, 27 Ga. App. 723, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 387

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 29, 1921

Docket12631, 12645

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 243 (Auld v. City of Elberton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Auld v. City of Elberton, 110 S.E. 243, 27 Ga. App. 723, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 387 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The judgment of the trial court granting a new trial was based specially upon two grounds of the motion therefor. It was the first grant of a new trial. It not appearing that no other verdict than the one rendered could possibly have been rendered under the law and the facts of the case, this court will not reverse the judgment. Parks v. Stevens, 21 Ga. App. 180 (94 S. E. 60).

2. There was no harmful error in any of the portions of the charge of the court excepted to in the cross-bill of exceptions, nor was there any merit in the other assignments of error therein.

Judgment on both bills of exceptions affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI