Auld v. Chamberlain

Supreme Court of Iowa

Auld v. Chamberlain

3 N.W. 635, 52 Iowa 745

DecidedDecember 10, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.W. 635 (Auld v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Auld v. Chamberlain, 3 N.W. 635, 52 Iowa 745 (iowa 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Seevers, J.

— The errors assigned are that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the judgment, and that the damages are excessive. Each of us [746]*746have separately read and considered the evidence, and separately reached the conclusion rvc cannot interfere, under the settled practice of this court, with the judgment below. It is impossible to say the court was actuated by either passion or prejudice. On the contrary we are of the opinion the evidence fully warrants the finding.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seevers, J.

— The errors assigned are that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the judgment, and that the damages are excessive. Each of us [746]*746have separately read and considered the evidence, and separately reached the conclusion rvc cannot interfere, under the settled practice of this court, with the judgment below. It is impossible to say the court was actuated by either passion or prejudice. On the contrary we are of the opinion the evidence fully warrants the finding.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.W. 635, 52 Iowa 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auld-v-chamberlain-iowa-1879.