Auh-Hahnemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Auh-Hahnemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

906 A.2d 531

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 27, 2006

DocketNo. 938 MAL 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 906 A.2d 531 (Auh-Hahnemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Auh-Hahnemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 906 A.2d 531 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he views the Commonwealth Court’s present holding, which precludes Employer from requesting an IRE based upon its failure to make such a request within the sixty-day time limitation of Section 306(a.2)(l), see 77 P.S. 511.2(1), as inconsistent with the reasoning of Gardner v. WCAB (Genesis [532]*532Health Ventures), 585 Pa. 366, 382-84, 888 A.2d 758, 768 (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he views the Commonwealth Court’s present holding, which precludes Employer from requesting an IRE based upon its failure to make such a request within the sixty-day time limitation of Section 306(a.2)(l), see 77 P.S. 511.2(1), as inconsistent with the reasoning of Gardner v. WCAB (Genesis [532]*532Health Ventures), 585 Pa. 366, 382-84, 888 A.2d 758, 768 (2005).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

906 A.2d 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auh-hahnemann-v-workers-compensation-appeal-board-pa-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack