Augustus Rose v. State of Florida
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
AUGUSTUS ROSE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1446
[December 11, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Leatha D. Mullins, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472013CF000579.
Hani Demetrious of the Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Augustus Rose v. State of Florida (Augustus Rose v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.