AUGUSTUS ROSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of AUGUSTUS ROSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (AUGUSTUS ROSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
AUGUSTUS ROSE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-871
[March 31, 2022]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael J. McNicholas, Judge; L.T. Case No. 47- 2013-CF-000579-A.
Robert David Malove of Robert David Malove, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and CIKLIN, J.J., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
AUGUSTUS ROSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustus-rose-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.