Augustine v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.

S.D. California

Augustine v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided April 3, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-02027·Unknown

Opinion

I 2 5 6 OPHELIA AUGUSTINE, Case No.: 22-cv-2027-L-AHG Plaintitt.| ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 8 V. DISMISS AS MOOT 9 LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., [ECF No. 8] 10 Defendant. 11 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff 13 timely filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). 14 Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot. Ramirez v. County of San 15 Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Defendant shall file a response to the 16 }amended complaint, if any, no later than the time provided for in Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 15(a)(3). 19 20 Dated: April 3, 2023 fee Soop 22 H . James Lorenz, 33 United States District Judge

24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I 2 5 6 OPHELIA AUGUSTINE, Case No.: 22-cv-2027-L-AHG Plaintitt.| ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 8 V. DISMISS AS MOOT 9 LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., [ECF No. 8] 10 Defendant. 11 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff 13 timely filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). 14 Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot. Ramirez v. County of San 15 Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Defendant shall file a response to the 16 }amended complaint, if any, no later than the time provided for in Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 15(a)(3). 19 20 Dated: April 3, 2023 fee Soop 22 H . James Lorenz, 33 United States District Judge

24 25 26 27 28

Augustine v. Lenovo (United States), Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Augustine v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. (Augustine v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related