Augustine v. Clifton
Opinion
The appellant represented a criminal defendant as privately retained counsel through the imposition of sentence, and thereafter withdrew. Substitute counsel requested a copy of the transcript, which was denied, and thereafter filed a motion for new trial and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The trial court granted the latter motion, and at the same time directed the appellant to pay a substantial sum to the court reporter for the cost of preparing the transcript. Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied, and appealed.
Although a court has power “[t]o control, in the furtherance of justice, the conduct of its officers and all other persons connected [554]*554with a judicial proceeding before it,...” Code Ann. § 24-104, it has no authority, by in personam order, to compel the payment of private contractual obligations incurred by an attorney for court reporting services.1 See Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232, 234 (248 SE2d 631) (1978).
The order is therefore beyond the power of the trial court.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
284 S.E.2d 432 (Augustine v. Clifton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.