Augustine Meyer v. State
This text of Augustine Meyer v. State (Augustine Meyer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00606-CR
Augustine MEYER, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR6809W Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 13, 2010
DISMISSED
The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a
plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant
has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(d). Accordingly, on September 29, 2010, this court issued an order stating this appeal
would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that 04-10-00606-CR
shows defendant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v.
State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.
On September 29, 2010, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has
no choice but to dismiss the appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s
counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed.
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Augustine Meyer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustine-meyer-v-state-texapp-2010.