Augustine Meyer v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 2010·No. 04-10-00606-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00606-CR

Augustine MEYER, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR6809W Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 13, 2010

DISMISSED

The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(d). Accordingly, on September 29, 2010, this court issued an order stating this appeal

would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that 04-10-00606-CR

shows defendant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v.

State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

On September 29, 2010, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has

no choice but to dismiss the appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s

counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is

dismissed.

Do not publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Augustine Meyer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Augustine Meyer v. State (Augustine Meyer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)