Augustine Forkwar v. Progressive Northern Insurance

537 F. App'x 197
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2013
Docket13-1072
StatusUnpublished

This text of 537 F. App'x 197 (Augustine Forkwar v. Progressive Northern Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Augustine Forkwar v. Progressive Northern Insurance, 537 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

*198 PER CURIAM:

This case involves a coverage dispute under a commercial auto liability insurance policy. On appeal, Augustine Forkwar (Plaintiff) challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Defendant) with respect to Plaintiffs claims alleging breach of contract and entitlement to declaratory relief.

Our careful review of the briefing, appellate record, and relevant law compels us to conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court, as stated in its well-reasoned December 14, 2012 memorandum opinion.* Forkwar v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 910 F.Supp.2d 815 (D.Md.2012).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forkwar v. Progressive Northern Insurance
910 F. Supp. 2d 815 (D. Maryland, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 F. App'x 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustine-forkwar-v-progressive-northern-insurance-ca4-2013.