Augustine Arellano v. Elizabeth Sereseroz Arellano

Court of Appeals of Texas

Augustine Arellano v. Elizabeth Sereseroz Arellano

DecidedJune 23, 2010

Docket12-10-00143-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Augustine Arellano v. Elizabeth Sereseroz Arellano (Augustine Arellano v. Elizabeth Sereseroz Arellano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Augustine Arellano v. Elizabeth Sereseroz Arellano, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00143-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS AUGUSTINE ARELLANO, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 349TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

ELIZABETH SERESEROZ ARELLANO, ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This pro se in forma pauperis appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on April 12, 2010. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment. On May 14, 2010, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before June 14, 2010, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not corrected his defective notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04- 00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied). Opinion delivered June 23, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-10-00143-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS AUGUSTINE ARELLANO, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 349TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

ELIZABETH SERESEROZ ARELLANO, ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This pro se in forma pauperis appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on April 12, 2010. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment. On May 14, 2010, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before June 14, 2010, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not corrected his defective notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04- 00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied). Opinion delivered June 23, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Augustine Arellano v. Elizabeth Sereseroz Arellano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustine-arellano-v-elizabeth-sereseroz-arellano-texapp-2010.