Augustin Valdez, Jr. v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General of the United States
This text of 216 F.2d 616 (Augustin Valdez, Jr. v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
216 F.2d 616
Augustin VALDEZ, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., as Attorney General of the United
States,* Appellee.
No. 13860.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 3, 1953.
Nov. 12, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William M. Byrne, Judge.
Philip Newman, Newman & Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Cecil Hicks, Clyde C. Downing, Robert K. Grean, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and WIIG, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Valdez v. McGranery, D.C.S.D.Cal., 114 F.Supp. 173, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Attorney General Brownell was substituted for Attorney General McGranery on
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 F.2d 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustin-valdez-jr-v-herbert-brownell-jr-as-attorney-general-of-the-ca9-1954.