Augustin Valdez, Jr. v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General of the United States
Opinion
216 F.2d 616
Augustin VALDEZ, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., as Attorney General of the United
States,* Appellee.
No. 13860.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 3, 1953.
Nov. 12, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William M. Byrne, Judge.
Philip Newman, Newman & Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Cecil Hicks, Clyde C. Downing, Robert K. Grean, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and WIIG, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Valdez v. McGranery, D.C.S.D.Cal., 114 F.Supp. 173, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Attorney General Brownell was substituted for Attorney General McGranery on
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
216 F.2d 616 (Augustin Valdez, Jr. v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.